We think that the way we’re used to doing things must be the way things should be done. We don’t tend to think “Is it possible that there might be some benefit or use to what kids are doing that we never did?”
I’m reading Clay Shirky’s Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age. It’s about how technology makes use of human talent and generosity in ways that haven’t been possible in the past. It’s a pretty significant departure from the technology-is-ruining-us, especially-the-kids rhetoric. Here’s an interesting passage, which reminded me of the piece I linked to a few weeks ago about how kids are reading more than before, even while we agonize about the screen time:
“…young populations with access to fast, interactive media are shifting their behavior away from media that presupposes pure consumption. Even when they watch video online, seemingly pure analog to TV, they have opportunities to comment on the material, to share it with their friends, to label, rate, or rank it, and of course, to discuss it with other viewers around the world… Even when they are engaged in watching TV, in other words, many members of the networked population are engaged with one another, and this engagement correlates with behaviors other than passive consumption.”
And a few pages later:
“It’s also easy to assume that the world as it currently exists represents some sort of ideal expression of society, and that all deviations from this sacred tradition are both shocking and bad.”
It’s this assumption that has us tend to jump to conclusions about kids’ technology use. We think that the way we’re used to doing things must be the way things should be done. We don’t tend to think “Is it possible that there might be some benefit or use to what kids are doing that we never did?” Shirky’s suggesting that we look a little more closely. This is not to say that just by virtue of being looked at more closely what kids are up to with their technology will seem more worthwhile. It’s only to say that we don’t have the foggiest notion what kids do and don’t get out of what they’re doing. It isn’t necessarily bad for them just because we didn’t have it when we were young. And as Shirky suggests, it’s possible that it’s leading us to a place of even more social engagement, connection, and potential contribution than was possible when we were growing up. Maybe more than has ever been possible.
If you’re interested in more on this topic, I highly recommend the book. It’s unusual in that the thinking is dense, deep, innovative, but the writing makes it very accessible. You can also get a taste for the content from Shirky’s TED talk on the topic.